Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TurningWheels for Kids
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
TurningWheels for Kids[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- TurningWheels for Kids (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about local charity that has been unsourced since 2007. Some sources suggested on talk page but nothing that strongly supports notability. In my view does not pass WP:NCORP. Mccapra (talk) 18:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 18:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 18:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 18:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Fails notability for corporations. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm finding one bit of decent sized coverage in The Mercury News, but that appears to be it. All other coverage appears to be only in local sources, or merely mentions of the charity with no further information. That single source would not allow this to pass the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 15:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The article has 0 refs. First page Google presence (which is considered to be the most reliable and followed) is on Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Yelp, Subject's Website & Mercury News. Just one article (that too which is too less) certainly does not make notable. Yourmasterishere (talk) 13:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.